HOME CORRECTIONS YEARBOOK PROJECTS ABOUT CJI/CJS CONTACT
   

National Projects/Studies of Critical
Corrections Issues


State of Washington Department of Corrections’ Stafford Creek Corrections Center ­ Institutional Culture Assessment (2003-2004): An institutional culture assessment was conducted by a CJI trained team using a standardized process and instrumentation designed specifically to assess a prison’s culture. Qualitative and quantitative results of the assessment were presented in detail. These include the degree of congruence between the “desired” and current culture, the extent to which staff components differ in their values and beliefs, and the distinctive cultural characteristics of the institution and its various subculture groups. Issues that place the facility at risk for more significant problems were identified, and suggested courses of early intervention were provided. [George Camp]

Best Practices in Prison Staffing Analysis (2004): Through a cooperative agreement with the National Institute of Corrections, CJI is developing a training program, with accompanying materials, to be used by state correctional agencies to train their staff on how to conduct prison staffing analyses. Three focus group meetings have been facilitated with select groups of practitioners from diverse state correctional agencies. [Camille Camp, Patricia Hardyman, Judy Bisbee]

Leading and Sustaining Change (2003 - 2004): Through a cooperative agreement with NIC, CJI is embarking on a project, entitled “Leading and Sustaining Change.” The project, which builds upon what has been learned from the “Assessment of Institutional Culture” project, focuses on organizational change, leadership and culture. [George Camp, Marla Clayton]

Managing Elderly Inmates and Inmates with Chronic Terminal Illnesses (2002-2004):
Through a cooperative agreement with NIC, CJI identified the most promising approaches to addressing the needs of special needs inmates. The project resulted in a manual published in 2004, entitled “Correctional Healthcare: Addressing the Needs of Elderly, Chronically Ill and Terminally Ill Inmates.” [Camille Camp, John Blackmore, Judy Bisbee]

Prison Culture Assessment (2001 - 2004): Through a cooperative agreement with NIC, CJI has developed, field-tested and applied a Prison Culture Assessment Protocol in the process of assessing the institutional culture in 20 state and federal prisons and one large county jail. Six more prisons will be assessed over the next several months. The lessons learned from the process have been used by prison administrators to improve the culture and in particular to promote and instill more positive beliefs and values in the workforce. [George Camp, Peter Rockholz, Shaina Vanek]

Department of Corrections Staff Salaries and Fringe Benefits (1999) and (2003): In 1999, and again in 2003, CJI conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of the salary and benefits for correctional officers, sergeants, lieutenants, and captains in all state correctional agencies. [George Camp, Judy Bisbee]

Information Collection and Dissemination ­ The Corrections Yearbook (1980-2003):
The Corrections Yearbook is an annual publication of CJI. Started in 1980 as a “Pocket Guide” of key correctional statistics, The Corrections Yearbook continues to present the timeliest information available and has become an invaluable resource to those involved in practicing, studying or researching corrections. Via The Corrections Yearbook, CJI has developed a national perspective of corrections systems including: inmate populations, operating costs, capital expenditures, staffing costs, and per bed costs. The Yearbook data are accessible electronically to assist us in proposing improved utilization strategies to departments of corrections. [Camille Camp, George Camp]

Pension Improvement for the Corrections Workforce (2002): CJI conducted a series of focus groups with national retirement system experts and correctional practitioners to consider the feasibility of offering a fixed contribution pension program as a supplement or alternative to the traditional fixed benefit pension programs currently in place in most correctional agencies. A report containing findings and recommendations was submitted to NIC and disseminated to national criminal justice associations for consideration and implementation. [John Blackmore]

Addressing Prison Workforce Issues in the 21st Century (2001-2002):
With funding from the National Institute of Corrections, CJI convened four regional meetings of correctional administrators, human resource managers, academic authorities, and human resource consultants to consider strategies of how better to attract and retain staff. On the basis of their deliberations, CJI conducted an analysis of correctional workforce issue areas and suggested a broad range of programs and approaches to address them. [George Camp]

Contracting for Correctional Services (2000 - 2001): With funding from the Office of Justice Programs, via the Association of State Correctional Administrators, CJI documented best practices for contracting with and monitoring contracts with private firms. Two reports were produced and distributed nationally. [Camille Camp, George Camp]

Strategic Planning (2000): With funding from the Corrections Program Office, CJI developed a strategy to assist state departments of corrections in the Strategic Planning process. The initiative was designed to enable agencies and organizations to be successful in looking beyond the turmoil of day-to-day operations and to the future to determine their mission and to identify measures and tasks to achieve their objectives. [Camille Camp, George Camp, Robert May]

Planning and Designing Prison Based Therapeutic Communities (1998 - 1999): CJI designed and conducted Regional Planning and Design of Prison-Based Therapeutic Communities Therapeutic Communities for the Corrections Program Office in support of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Program. [Peter Rockholz, Robert May, George Camp]

Alternatives for Financing Prison Facilities (1999): The Corrections Program Office of the Office of Justice Programs commissioned a study on creative ways to finance and develop new prison facilities. George and Camille Camp, as the Executive Directorate of the Association of State Correctional Administrators, supervised the study and publication of the final report. The report detailed options such General Obligation Bonds, Revenue Bonds, Certificates of Participation and County and Municipal Financing of Prison Facilities. [George Camp and Camille Camp]

Statewide Planning for Substance Abuse Treatment Programs Regional Training Programs (1997 - 1999): CJI planned and conducted a series of regional training programs for teams of state policymakers and senior administrators on developing a Statewide Comprehensive Plan for Substance Abuse Treatment. [Camille Camp, George Camp, Robert May]

Boot camps (2), Privatization, Managing Violent Offenders, Understanding Violent Juvenile Offenders, Substance Abuse Treatment (2), (1995 ­ 1999): Under a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice’s Corrections Program Office, CJI planned all aspects and delivered in their entirety seven national conferences on these critical issues for state policy makers and practitioners to assist them in making better informed decisions. Conferences ranged in size from 150 to 450 participants. [Camille Camp, George Camp, Robert May, John Blackmore]

Understanding and Preventing Prison Riots (1994 - 1996):
CJI conducted a national field study of prison riots and subsequent management responses. A series of case studies were presented and response methods compared relative to immediate and longer term approaches to resolving and preventing riots. The results were published in a book entitled The Resolution of Prison Riots ­ Strategies and Policies, published by Oxford University Press in 1998. [Camille Camp, George Camp]

Correctional Officer Turnover (1993 ­ 1994): On behalf of the Association of State Correctional Administrators, and with funding from the National Institute of Corrections, CJI surveyed all state correctional agencies, conducted site visits at twelve prisons to examine and understand staff turnover and staff recruitment and retention methods in use in prisons across the country. The results were published by the National Institute of Corrections in a report entitled Managing Staff: Corrections’ Most Valuable Resource. [Camille Camp, George Camp]

Comparing the Cost of Probation and Incarceration (1991): CJI assisted the U.S. Government Accounting Office, (GAO) in performing a comparative analysis of the cost to supervise probationers under intensive supervision and regular supervision as opposed to the cost incarceration. The GAO published the results of the analysis, along with other data. [George Camp]

Contracting with the Private Sector (1988): With funds from a grant from the National Institute of Corrections, CJI examined the processes employed by correctional agencies to contract with the private sector as well to monitor the terms and conditions of the contract. Best practices were identified and reported in a NIC Publication entitled, Management of Correctional Contracts. [Camille Camp, George Camp]

Strategies for Managing and Controlling Prison Gangs (1987 - 1988): Through a grant from the National Institute of Justice, CJI conduct fieldwork in state prisons in California, Illinois, and Washington to develop a series of comprehensive strategies on how best to manage prison gangs. The strategies were compiled into a report entitled, The Management of Prison Gangs. [Camille Camp, George Camp]

Comparing the Cost of Perimeter Towers and Detection Systems (1987): With funds from the National Institute of Justice, CJI conducted a national study comparing the cost of staffing perimeter towers as opposed to utilizing electronic intrusion systems. The results of the analysis were published by NIJ in a publication entitled, Stopping Escapes. [Camille Camp, George Camp]

Management of Crowded Prisons (1986): Under a grant from the National Institute of Corrections, CJI surveyed all state correctional agencies, conducted fieldwork in fourteen prisons, and identified and compared practices and strategies for managing crowded prisons. The results were published by NIC in a report entitled, The Management of Crowded Prisons. [Camille Camp, George Camp]

Nature and Extent of Prison Gangs (1985):
Under a grant from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Policy, CJI conducted a national survey of state and federal prisons to identify the number of prison gangs and to categorize them by type according to their structure and purpose. The results of the study were published by the Justice Department. [Camille Camp, George Camp]

The Real Cost of Corrections (1985): CJI analyzed both the direct and indirect factors that generate the costs of operating prison systems. This national study of incarceration costs noted variations in the real costs of housing special needs offenders as compared to average costs for aggregate populations. The study’s findings were presented in their research report, The Real Cost of Corrections. [George Camp, Camille Camp]

Private Sector Development of “Spec” Prisons (1998-1999): Planned and conducted a national workshop on the private sector development of “spec” prisons at which representatives from both the private and public sector discussed the pros and cons of these matters. [George Camp]

The Role of the Private Sector in Corrections (1984): Under a grant from the National Institute of Corrections, CJI determined the extent to which correctional agencies were contracting with private providers for specific types of services. The results of the study were published by NIC. [Camille Camp, George Camp]

Reducing Prisoner Litigation in Federal Courts (1978 ­ 1981): With support from the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, the Winthrop Rockefeller Foundation, and the National Institute of Corrections, CJI established the National Center for Correctional Mediation and worked with Judges in federal courts in Arkansas and Connecticut to resolve informally lawsuit brought by prisoners in the Arkansas Department of Corrections, and at the Federal Correctional Institution in Danbury, CT. During the projects four years hundreds of lawsuits were successfully concluded through the mediation process, reducing the backlog of lawsuits dramatically in those jurisdictions. [George Camp]

Regional Prisons ­ Evaluation of Texarkana Texas/Arkansas Regional Jail (1980): Under a grant from the National Institution of Corrections, CJI conducted an evaluation of the operation of Texarkana Jail that is situated on the state line and is jointly operated and used by Texarkana Arkansas and Texarkana Texas. [George Camp]

Regional Prisons ­ Feasibility of a Five-State Maximum Security Prison (1978 - 1979): With funds from the National Institute of Corrections, CJI explored the feasibility of establishing a regional prison authority for the construction and operation of a five-state maximum security prison to confine state prisoners from Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah. Based on preliminary interest of the parties, meetings with state policy makers and practitioners were held to develop the concept and determine the feasibility of implementing a plan. [George Camp]

back to top
 

Project Categories


National Projects/Studies of Critical Corrections Issues

Assessments of Issues and Operations in Department of Corrections

Assessments and Projects in Prisons and Jails

Facility Planning Studies and Needs Assessment Projects

Post Analysis and Staffing Studies

Services provided to the Association of State Correctional Administrators
     

213 Court Street, 6th Floor, Middletown, CT 06457 p.860.704.6400 f.860.704.6420